"Then What Did Jesus Accomplish?" Part II (On Law)


            In the last article, I began to address the Catholic understanding of grace, as opposed to common Protestant beliefs regarding God’s grace. In order to understand grace, we must understand sin, first. So, in brief, I began retelling the story of humankind’s original loss of grace (Part I). In summary, we found that in choosing behavior and actions outside of the Love of God, we were also deprived, or disassociated, from the Life of God within us, which was the cause of humankind’s original status of holiness and justice that are founded upon Love itself. Simply, stepping outside of the relationship with Love and Life itself, we lost that same Love and Life, called “grace.” (CCC, 417,418).
            Through our original loss of grace, our parents found themselves in a lacking of fullness. Because of that lack, that missing piece, it was impossible that grace be received through inheritance ever again. Instead, it became the natural state in which humans were born – deprived of the grace of God. What one does not have, cannot be given. We call this “original sin,” in a positive manner, rather than the passive.
            Fast forward thousands of years, when the Law was given to the people of Israel through Moses. Until that time, there was only the Natural Law, for which all humankind through reason was capable of deducing. This included things like “There is one God,” and “Thou shalt not murder.” These laws are understood from the natural reason given to humankind, without the aid of Divine Revelation.
            Moses, however, was given a Divine Law (inspired by God, who is Love). In this Law, the Israelites were called to a greater holiness than the rest of the world. This is their priesthood to the nations. In the Law was the Wisdom of God, and it showed forth the true call to holiness, justice and mercy that humankind was called to: “He has told you, O mortal, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? (Micah 6:8 NRSVCE)”
            The purpose of the Law, though, is not only to call us to love our neighbor and God, our Life, but to show where we stand in relation to our original purpose of love: it shows that we are sinners, in need of grace. St. Paul wrote extensively about the law and grace in his letter to the Romans. In it, he explained that the Law itself has not the ability to bring eternal life, simply because it does not empower us to fulfill the just requirements of the Law; it merely teaches us where we lack in justice, since we have all fallen short of it.
            In this regard, let us paint an image for the mind to show just what the relationship is between the Law, sin, death and Life:
            Imagine, if you will, a sea of water, above which is an abundance of open air. Let us imagine that the air itself represents God and his being of Love and our source of Life. Humans, when fallen out of grace and into sin (error), are separated from the air and plunged into the sea, under the water. The Law, which is merely the objective reality of what is holy and good, consisting of love, is the object of obstruction between the sea of water and the air. Perhaps we can imagine the Law to be a slab of frozen ice over the sea, which keeps us from accessing the fullness of Life, the air.
            That slab of ice – the Law – is continually keeping us down under water, preventing us from full access to the air (God/ Life).  That is, the Law is continually condemning us, because we have fallen out of fulfilling its goodness. The Law only sheds light on the reality of our sin and, therefore, keeps us under the oppression of death. The Law itself can never become a means by which humans can freely access the God, who is Life and Love. The Law can never provide a way back to Life, to breathe that wonderful air in again fully. We will end the metaphor here, but it could continue.
            St. Paul describes this in his own method fairly comprehensively (Rom. 5-8). Although he is mostly speaking about the Jewish ritual laws of circumcision and other requirements that Gentiles did not fulfill, it serves the same purpose as the full Law. At one point, he tells us what the solution is to our continual guilt under the Law:

For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. (Rom. 8:2-4 NRSVCE)

Of course, the Law, though good, always condemns us. But the answer that God has for the problem is that he would come in the flesh to fulfill the Law perfectly, to suffer and to die in order to overcome sin and death, and therefore, the Law itself. He destroyed the power of the Law itself, by fulfilling it to its highest possibility of love – to give up one’s life for one’s friends.
            By fulfilling the Law in human flesh, he was able to make an infinite sacrifice, which became an unending source of grace for those who would freely accept the sacrifice through faith. He was able to atone for our lack. He was able to free us from condemnation, by forgiving our sins. Much more, though, he was able to make us new creations. By his fulfillment of the law and death on the Cross, we were made able to be regenerated by grace and in grace. He made it possible for us to be returned to our life in grace, similar to our original state. Ultimately, this comes about by the pouring out of his Spirit into our hearts, whereby we are literally brought back into union with God, with Love, and given life.
            At this point, I probably sound like a Protestant, except that I did not mention the word “impute” … which is a nasty word. (I say that with a smile). It is at this point where that will come to an end. This is where the Catholic understanding of sin and grace becomes radically different than the Protestant understanding. For a Catholic, it is understood that one can be baptized and regenerated, but still later become a slave to sin. For a Catholic, it is understood that being in a state of grace, like Adam and Eve obviously were, does not guarantee falling from grace through sin, back into death. The Catholic believes that grace is something like the Parable of Talents speaks about, and must be used or will be lost or taken away (Matthew 25:14-30).
            That is where the understanding of “faith working through love,” “faith and works” and “there is a sin leading to death” come into play, but I will write in the next article about spiritual re-birth and significance of grace in the soul of the believer to give the actual ability to fulfill the law, above and beyond natural capabilities (supernaturally).


For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. For all who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God. For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received a spirit of adoption. When we cry, “Abba! Father!” it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ—if, in fact, we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him (Romans 8:13-17).
           






Ave Maria, gratia plena, dominus tecum.
benedicta tu in mulieribus,
et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Iesus.
Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus,
nunc et in hora mortis nostrae.

Amen. +

"Then What Did Jesus Accomplish?" Part I (On Sin)


            In speaking with many non-Catholic Christians about the significance of Jesus’ death on the Cross and what was accomplished through it, I find that there is often a disconnect between the Catholic understanding of grace and many popular, Protestant understandings of grace and its effect. The popular, Protestant concept of grace that I am writing about here is the one in which it is understood that Christ applies his grace as an undeserved mercy and forgiveness of sin, restoring the sinner to God perfectly, without the need of any future serious following of the Law. In that understanding, sin has no true eternal effect on the soul any more after the start of the Christian life. (Some Protestants do hold, of course, another nuanced perspective that it takes some very hard work of persistent and rebellious sin or outright apostasy to “fall from grace,” as St. Paul put it (Gal. 5:4)). The Catholic perspective is much more radical.
            The Catholic Church teaches that sin can still lead to eternal death, even for a baptized (born-again) Christian. In fact, the Church teaches that one single act of grave, fully-willed and fully-known sin will rupture our relationship with God and destroy Charity within our souls (CCC, 1854-1857). “For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live,” wrote St. Paul (Romans 8:13-14 NRSVCE). St. John was in agreement when he wrote, “There is sin that is mortal” (1 John 5:16 NRSVCE). For some Protestants, though, a specific objection arises: “What did Jesus actually do for us, or accomplish, if we can still sin and lose Eternal Life? I thought that Jesus died to forgive me of my sins. I thought that I could not earn my salvation. What does the Law have to do with my salvation, when I will always be a guilty sinner, who broke the Law?”
            Allow me to paint a picture for the mind here and perhaps retell a little bit of history, in order to elaborate on the Catholic teaching of the Gospel and the relevance of Law. Most importantly, and as a preface, what is sin, and why does it rupture our relationship with God? Is it merely a rule being broken, causing an angry God to justly punish us for not “playing by the rules?” No, certainly not. Our God is not so simple, and certainly not so stupid. The Law, as St. Paul wrote, is for our instruction: “If it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin” (Rom. 7:7 NRSVCE).
Our God is Love itself. When we sin, we are falling outside of that perfect relationship of Love itself, which always and completely gives of itself for the other. Sin is the misuse of creation, the broken use of creation or creatures. Sin is destructive to ourselves and others, always; it is communal. Sin is disease in our relationships with all of creation, and the Source of that creation. It kills us, because sin is any act against love, and is outside of he who is Life and Love. The natural consequence of sin is to be separated from Life and Love, simply because sin is the absence of that Life and Love.
In the beginning, when humankind was created, we were created in the state of Grace. We shared God’s life and lived in perfect loving relationship with each other, with creation, and with the God of Love, the Source of Life and Love. Sin, though, entered the world, through freewill and the temptation of selfish gain or pride. Suddenly, the love relationship was broken, not just between humans, but between humans and God. We became ill. We became blind to the Truth of Love. Our hearts grew darker and darker. Being separated from the Source of Love, we became unable to love to the utmost ability. Sin became a slavery. Law, whether understood through nature (like murder obviously being contrary to love) or understood through divine revelation, was that which merely showed how far humankind truly was from God and its origin. While acting as a light in the darkness – “Your word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path” – the Law itself did not provide the strength to fully accomplish the Law (Psalm 119:105). The Spirit would come to do that, but grace had not yet been fully given.

To be continued …
           
See Part II (On Law)

The Father of Mercy and Folly


            Oftentimes, many Christians envision God the Father only as an angry God who demands justice and perfection, perhaps even projecting their own faulty fathers. These Christians usually look only to Jesus for their consolation and the love that they seek, while missing the Father’s. Yet, we know from Jesus’ own words, that he was only ever doing and saying what the Father wanted him to do and say (John 12:49). It was in Jesus’ Person that he revealed God the Father as the God of Mercies, the God of Love, who sent his only Son to give his life for the life of the world.
            Fr. Raoul Plus, S.J. once wrote that we often speak of the “folly of the Cross,” as the Scriptures put it, but rarely ever ponder the “folly of the Father’s love.”1 The Father himself is one who sent the Messiah for our salvation. The Father is the one who “gave his only Son” to die, so that a world full of sinners, who return no such love to the One Who Loves, may have forgiveness, life, healing and peace. Moreover, the Father sent the Messiah, so that we may be one with him!
Jesus said, “Very truly, I tell you, anyone who hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life, and does not come under judgment, but has passed from death to life" (John 5:24 NRSVCE). He was constantly only speaking about the Father and his will: “And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day" (John 6:39 NRSVCE). That “life” that Christ desires for us is the same life that he shares with the Father: “As you, Father, are in me and I am in you, may they also be in us […] so that the world may know that you have sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me,” Jesus prayed (John 17:21-23 NRSVCE).
The “folly of the Father’s love” is that he sent the one, perfect Son, who had never disregarded his infinite and unconditional love to die a torturous and unjust death for the sake of us, degenerate sinners, who had spited the Father’s love and abandoned him to our own self-destructive ways. What folly! What mercy! What love! None of us would ever do such a thing. We are completely undeserving of this grace.
There is one request, though, from the Father, through Christ himself. That one request is to love as he has loved us. “As the Father has sent me, so I send you" (John 20:21). This is no mere call to baptize people and to tell people about the love of Jesus. This is a call to obey the Father as Jesus has obeyed every word of the Father, including and especially to love unto death of self: “Those who love me will keep my word, and my Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them. Whoever does not love me does not keep my words; and the word that you hear is not mine, but is from the Father who sent me" (John 14:23,24 NRSVCE). He is calling us to the “Father’s Folly.” He is calling us to love others has he has loved us, without regard to worldly consequences. Rise, let us be on our way.



Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and the God of all consolation, who consoles us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to console those who are in any affliction with the consolation with which we ourselves are consoled by God. – 2 Corinthians 1:3-4, NRSVCE


1 Plus, Raoul. The Little Book of the Blessed Virgin Mary: Model of Christians, Cause of Our Joy. Manchester, N.H.: Sophia Institute, 2010. Print.